WebAug 25, 2015 · This article discusses the Federal Court of Appeal decision on Canada (Attorney General) v.Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110.The issue in this case was whether a mother was discriminated against based on “family status” because her employer refused to give her the work schedule that she said she needed to look after her children.

Important Legal Cases – OWJN

WebMay 5, 2014 · On May 2, 2014, the Federal Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the findings of the Federal Court concerning an employer’s obligation to provide workplace … WebMar 11, 2014 · The Attorney General of Canada appealed. The Federal Court of Appeal, in a decision reported at 377 N.R. 235, dismissed the appeal with costs. The Canadian … birthday cake lip gloss glitter

Monarquia no Canadá – Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre

WebCanada (Attorney General) v. Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110. The Federal Court of Appeal held that family status includes childcare obligations if: a person has a child under their care and supervision; the childcare obligation engages the person’s legal responsibility for the child as opposed to a personal choice WebMay 22, 2014 · The Federal Court of Appeal recently released its decisions in Canada (Attorney General) v.Johnstone (Johnstone) and Canadian National Railway v. Seeley (Seeley), bringing much needed clarity to the scope of the protected ground of “family status” under the Canadian Human Rights Act (the Act) as it relates to childcare … WebJohnstone, a mother of two young children, was employed full-time as a Border Services Officer by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA). She worked rotating shifts which included weekends, days, evenings and nights. Her husband also worked for CBSA on a rotating schedule. ... Canada (Attorney General) v. Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110. birthday cake lichfield