Weby1 - 1978/4 N2 - An attribution analysis of opinion change viewed message persuasiveness as a function of inferred communicator biases. Recipients infer a knowledge bias (KB) by … Webof the gender of their peers (Jacklin & Maccoby, 1978). Serbin and her colleagues (Serbin, Sprafkin, Elman, & Doyle, 1982) observed 3- to 5-year-old preschoolers during play to determine whether the children’s use of direct requests would be an effective form of influence. Results revealed that boys were equally successful in
The Limits of Plot Accounting for How Women Interpret Stories…
WebAlice H. Eagly Northwestern University Steven J. Karau ... 1978). Moreover, J. A. Hall and Carter (1999) showed that as behaviors become more sex differentiated in actuality (as assessed by meta-analytic data), people judge them as increasingly appro-priate for only one sex. It thus appears that people tend to think that WebMay 23, 2024 · If you turn an F-16 upside down, you have the ’81 Eagle!”. Ward made some refinements for 1981 and the 8100 was even zoomier as Mike Mosley stuck it in … great lakes auto body
Sex differences in influenceability — Northwestern Scholars
WebISSN: N/A. EISSN: N/A. Sex Differences in Influenceability. Eagly, Alice H. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1, 86-116, Jan 78. Examines the hypothesis that women are more easily influenced than men by reviewing the literature on persuasion and conformity research. Persuasion research and conformity studies not involving group pressure show scant ... WebApr 19, 2024 · in social psychology (Cacioppo & Petty, 1980; Cooper, 1979; Eagly, 1978; Eagly & Wood, 1991; Janis & Field, 1959) found that women may be more responsive to social influence than men. Indeed, in a large meta-analysis, Eagly and Carli (1981) found that women are typically more persuadable than men. Notably, this gender difference … Webthan males, although Eagly (1978) reviewed many studies and found limited support for these proposi-tions. Gender differences are normally attributed to so-ciological and/or biological sources. For example, dif-ferent levels of structure are present in the environ-ment of boys (relatively unstructured) and girls (rela- floating shelves transparent background